The Father of Psychology(freud) was a what?.
Thats right, a Mother Frker and a Kid Frker.A cocaine user.
And so called Uni students that gain a major in this,end up as DOCS workers,
Becomes a Molester themselves.Maybe not in the sexual way, But they do Molester,The family,they rape it,they murder it and rip away the children to place them in what they call a Safe Place. I Would Never Trust a DOC worker to look after my Kid/s. Ask a Townsville 14 yr old girl, who was being Molested by her Carer,DOCS didnt listen when she try's to speak up, instead she walks into the DOCS office and pours petrol on herself and lights up, They Believe her now. But at what price? DOCS to, are as guilty as Molesting her,cos they let it happening, Same for that 10 yr old girl, gang raped, not once,but two lots of times.
They just handed her back and let it happen.
There is endless, a Labyrinth of abuse and braking of the law.
The System that governs us, that people voted in, are the ones also responsible. They can take the responsibility to act to the complains by the thousands that they get everyday.
They can amend the laws, just the way howard amended the gun laws. How Rudd is giving Us that Bonus money.
Like any other Job, we the people Voted them in.
now lets fire a few........

Interesting....

I knew that Freud used cocain (but then how many parents use drugs and are still able to parent appropriately?) but I wasn't aware that he was into incest and paedophilia.

Interesting theory that DoCS workers are molesterers. Never thought of it in that sense.

Its there to read, all over the net..But 1800's was way way different compare to laws today.
in the 1600's was witch hunting.
2008, pedophile hunting. No difference.

as law stands now, if you and I was at a building, and I was outside talking a piss and you decide to break in, when caught, Both, us, together are charged with break and enter.same for murder/rape/anything where a crime is committed in the company of 2 or more, all are guilty. Until proven in a court of law.

Same to with DOCS.
There is for sure, Some workers in there that are good. But are as guilty as the corrupted ones.

The crimes that one does and the other sees and backs that up, are guilty.

So, As my issue, if DOCS can just walk in and steals my 20min new born son, and used the 5 cops to march me out.
That becomes emotional murder.

That be like someone just walking up to you and your partner, places a gun to the partners head and pulls the trigger and walks away.

Whats your first human normal reaction ?.


By God, Yes, Any member of the department of child safety are accountable for that.
Even when they just lay in their stone cold bed,beating a cold stone heart, even then, they are accountable.
I cant sleep at night knowing what they have done to me. How the FRK do scums like that sleep at all?

a bet a few of them are.
Like the Cops, Judges, Priest, Nun's and just about anyone that walks this earth.
And they have a hide to Judge you when actually a Cop or a Judge could be a Pedo itself. actually not long ago a Judge in SA was busted porking a young boy, the same judge sent men to jail for the same thing.
Wouldn't ypu like to him in jail, I would piss and shit in his food.

Now you have Asked that one trillion million dollar Question.

How does any man, any?. proves he is a normal minded man.
How does the truth of what any man at any time says when ASKED. be believed ?.


How does the words that come out of truth be twisted to lies.?.

http://inastrangeland.wordpress.com/2008/08/27/because-rape-isnt-rape-if-a-12yo-consents/


Because rape isn’t rape if a 12yo ‘consents’
Wednesday 27 August 2008 · 1 Comment

A 24 year old man ‘had sex’ with a 12 year old girl. He got a sentence of 2 years and 10 months, but it has been suspended.

Why? Because the child “was an enthusiastic participant in the relationship.” That’s according to the judge.

Perhaps it’s worth reminding m’lud about the law. Children.Can’t.Consent. That makes it rape. No ifs, not buts, no maybes, no excuses.

Since when is a suspended sentence appropriate when a grown man has raped a child?

Sadly, the trope is all too familiar.

And a note to the media. It’s not sex. It’s rape. Another all too familiar trope.

Update: Hoyden about Town posts on the same horrible sotry, and links to the Adelaide Advertiser article, where the word ‘rape’ is never mentioned at all.

It seems the man was ‘immature’ and sexually inexperienced. Read - he wasn’t getting any. Clearly, that meant he was entitled to take a 12 year old’s body.

Categories: Media · Rape

yes, I read the above and thanks what a great link I am interested in the feminist stuff that I found through it.

Nuff said....


As I point a finger to the government