|
|
|
1 members (Alisa),
1,362
guests, and
31
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
Volcano earthquake report for Tuesday, 6 October 2026
• M 2.0 - 52 km WSW of Cantwell, Alaska
• M 0.1 - 39 km ENE of McKinney Acres, Texas
• M 1.3 - 16 km NE of Little Lake, CA
• M 1.5 - 9 km E of Borrego Springs, CA
• M 3.2 - 5 km ESE of Wofford Heights, CA
|
#13999
Wed 19 Jan 2005 04:26:PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 495
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 495 |
C'mon ew_289, its not a proper definition for the cancellation of the contract condition. Quality varies by the ppl view so the channels. Dept.of Fair Trading can not resolve any issue based on personal definitions. If by any, the channel would be good or bad and considered as technical problems. If the channel/signal lost then there is a legal base to cancell the contract if not covered by the contract. All I can say, the customer must be very carefull when signing the contract to any Pay-TV company even the little points/details can be very costly in time. Regards...
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics859,713
Posts894,508
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|