</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by ja:<br /><strong> I can't post in locked topic so I'l do it this way.<br /><br />Phil you are telling that you will step down as forum moderator if satfreak do the same thing.<br /><br />Sounds good!<br /><br />But!<br /><br />There is allways BUT......<br /><br />You are going to keep your admin position and still you will be able to do whatever you want and Satfreak will lose his position completly.<br /><br />He would be idiot if he accept your proposal.<br /><br />Phil, we visitors are not kids, think something better than this. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Phil has already showed his intentions. He has just reopened a thread that Satfreak had closed. Phil then made one post then he closed the thread again! Sort of a hit and run. Phil will still be able to do whatever he wants and Satfreak will have his hands tied behind his back. There is no link between Phil and Satfreak's positions on this board. If Phil wants to leave his Moderator job -but ofcourse still keep his more powerful Administrator status- then go ahead, regardless of what Satfreak does. This is just a shamefull ploy. Just as more bad news comes from Ubi and it's leadership. So if Satfreak leaves he his left with nothing and Phil still has everything.