|
|
|
0 members (),
897
guests, and
25
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
M 6.3 - 84 km SSW of Nikolski, Alaska
• M 1.5 - 17 km WNW of Mentone, Texas
• M 0.9 - 2 km SW of Dibble, Oklahoma
• M 4.1 - 104 km ENE of Khorugh, Tajikistan
• M 3.6 - 14 km N of Warner Springs, CA
• M 1.5 - 43 km WNW of Valdez, Alaska
• M 1.2 - 16 km NNW of San Simeon, CA
|
#24839
Mon 29 Aug 2005 03:27:AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 583
Mission Pilot Level 2
|
|
Mission Pilot Level 2
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 583 |
So if they compress to 13 Channels, won't that impact on the quality of the broadcast (i.e. Pixilation and everything else we hated about the TARBS pictures (except for PAL-NTSC-PAL conversion))?<br />I mean the compression was so high then, that unless it was a speaker on the news hardly moving the picture broke down into pixilation. I remember, for New Years Eve program on Pink (in the TARBS days) the studio had snow flakes run down the screen. This in turn pileated the picture so much that you could not even make out the picture.<br /><br />Vlad…
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics822,169
Posts856,962
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|