|
|
|
0 members (),
261
guests, and
24
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515 |
Hmm, a person is not a paedophile unless they are CONVICTED of sexual abuse against a minor in a court of law... Yet a person can be convicted of the crime yet have not touched a child at all.
I know, I know... People get convicted of things they haven't done all the time.
Mind you, I must add that DoCS will write in their files that an adult is a paedophile whether they have been charged, convicted or it's simply been suspected.
But I must agree and draw the line at the fact that a person should not be called a paedophile (or anything else for that matter) fact behind it... It's called defamation of character.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics724,570
Posts759,186
Members2,958
| |
Most Online4,158
Jun 21st, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 1996 - 2024 by David Cottle. Designed by David Bate Jr. All Rights Reserved.
By using this forum, the user agrees not to transfer any data or technical information received under the agreement, to any other entity without the express approval of the AUS-CITY Forum Admins and/or authors of individual posts (Forum Admins and DoD/USSPACECOM for the analysis of satellite tracking data).
Two-line elements (TLE) and all other satellite data presented and distributed via this forum and e-mail lists of AUS-CITY are distributed with permission from DoD/USSTRATCOM.
Reprise Hosting
|
|
