|
|
|
0 members (),
1,506
guests, and
23
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
M 6.5 - 177 km W of Nikolski, Alaska
• M 1.2 - 6 km W of Orcas, Washington
• M 0.8 - 86 km NNW of Karluk, Alaska
• M 1.4 - 49 km N of Valdez, Alaska
• M 3.2 - 2 km SW of Signal Hill, CA
• M 1.7 - 49 km SSE of Nelchina, Alaska
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
Taking a polygraph doesn't do much. They're inadmissable in court and they are not used in child protection. You can take one but basically as far as it going towards any child protection matter or clearing someone's name, it's useless. All it will do is tell the person taking it what they already knew. Police and child protection services won't touch a polygraph.
Polygraphs are not 100% accurate. In fact they can be easily fooled. Words will hold much more over a polygraph result.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics865,780
Posts900,576
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106
Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
