|
0 members (),
302
guests, and
23
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515 |
So what you're trying to say is that your problem was mainly to do with child safety and not with the police. Do you know if child safety tried to involve the police to have you charged because I know another that had similar circumstances like this.
If you weren't charge was any other member of your family charged? Michelle, if you are asking me this question... Yes, my own problem was centred around issues DoCS decided that they had. DoCS couldn't involve the police with me - nothing I had supposedly done or didn't do warranted charges being laid or a police investigation. My husband was charged before DoCS became involved... It was the police who contacted DoCS in the first place. Some months later my husband wore a second charge and the police wanted to question me about what he was charged for as well - but between them declaring at one of my husband's trials that they wanted to speak with me and my husband's car accident about 3 months later - the police had never knocked on my door or called me at all... They never made an attempt to contact me. I don't know what might have happened... If the police had decided that they wanted to lay the same charge against me (attempting to pervert justice) DoCS might have jumped on that and tried to use it against me... But it never happened, so I have no idea.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515 |
Yes, it is becoming extremely ridiculous and out of control.
In some ways, it is reverting back to the dark ages.
Men had been encouraged for so long to help care for their children and to help in the raising of their children... So many men out there want to be as involved as the women are.
But if infant or child has poop from one end to the other - the father can't clean it properly or he's done for sexual abuse... If he thinks that the child needs a bath to be washed properly - he's done for sexual abuse because he's washing a girls genitalia in the bath tub.
And we all know that mess like that can get everywhere on a child - especially with a girl! Hooly dooly, it can be all over the place... And it warrants a darn good clean - whether with baby wipes or a flannel in the bath tub.
God forbid that a father does it!!
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
The Public today have not got a clue how FUCKED DOCS ARE.
I like that Quote..... SO!!! again, I ask, when and how, do we as the abused, inform the public on a grand scale to how truly DOCS are so fingered?.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352 |
Hi,
Ihategov that is so correct. Once docs came to my door and my child and I were swimming in the pool. I was just wearing my undies (skin coloured) and docs were shocked when they looked through the front window - whilst I am shouting out 'give me a minute'.
the when I told docs about my child sexually acting out after visits with the father. docs then went on at me about me and my female boarder who would jump in the pool quickly in undies or (her nude) to cool off after me mowing the lawn or her after she did her serious cycling stuff (she was training and do millions of miles on her push bike and then would come home , peel off those cycle clothes and jump in the pool and then get out. It wasnt' any naked orgy or perverted sort of weird stuff) anyway docs worker went on about appropriateness of actions around the then 4 yo male child.
Well male child is nearly 6 and still gate crashes my shower! He has his toys and gets in their and plays and couldn't care less about my nakedness.
I thought all the above in my entry here was within the realm of normal. docs are becoming the moral judges and taking it to the inth degree.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352 |
My son was probably not in the pool at that time either and would have been doing whatever around the house like a 'normal 4 yo child'.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 386
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 386 |
god those bitches are sick....maybe they are actually abusing their own children as well....if not then we get to suffer their sick fantasies
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
I know that Departmental workers are aware of this site too. There has been a lot of talk about it recently. Many people are interested to see what will happen.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515 |
I reckon something will happen - that's for sure.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
aye, and I made bloody sure those wankers knew how to get here....... And the cops are no better.they rather look at the back files of 20 yrs ago and waste all the time investigating the past, when they Could be focused on investigating DOCS.and hear of the pains they inflicted.
Oddly enough DOCS are bunch of monkey's that you cant put a restraining order on. Now, Why, is that?????>>
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 14
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 14 |
So what you're trying to say is that your problem was mainly to do with child safety and not with the police. Do you know if child safety tried to involve the police to have you charged because I know another that had similar circumstances like this.
If you weren't charge was any other member of your family charged? Michelle, if you are asking me this question... Yes, my own problem was centred around issues DoCS decided that they had. DoCS couldn't involve the police with me - nothing I had supposedly done or didn't do warranted charges being laid or a police investigation. My husband was charged before DoCS became involved... It was the police who contacted DoCS in the first place. Some months later my husband wore a second charge and the police wanted to question me about what he was charged for as well - but between them declaring at one of my husband's trials that they wanted to speak with me and my husband's car accident about 3 months later - the police had never knocked on my door or called me at all... They never made an attempt to contact me. I don't know what might have happened... If the police had decided that they wanted to lay the same charge against me (attempting to pervert justice) DoCS might have jumped on that and tried to use it against me... But it never happened, so I have no idea. Thanks for your reply. They seem to treat everyone the same as my husband was charged, months later they bumped up another charge, DoCHS tried to have me charged, The police tried to have me charged on the same charge as they tried with you Perverting the course of Justice, they charged me, They uncharged me, (dropped the charge) its all a game for them to wear you down.
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 14
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 14 |
The Public today have not got a clue how FUCKED DOCS ARE.
I like that Quote..... SO!!! again, I ask, when and how, do we as the abused, inform the public on a grand scale to how truly DOCS are so fingered?. Wasn't it I hate Gov Dept that said that one day something will happen with child safety and one day and the government will deny it that they knew there was a problem but how can they deny it now when this site has hundreds of pages of complaints also the amounts of documented letters sent to all the politicians in this what was a great country
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Thanks for your reply. They seem to treat everyone the same as my husband was charged, months later they bumped up another charge, DoCHS tried to have me charged, The police tried to have me charged on the same charge as they tried with you Perverting the course of Justice, they charged me, They uncharged me, (dropped the charge) its all a game for them to wear you down.
The Police make you laugh today as they always try the same dirty tricks on just about everyone. See they charge you say with attempted rape, they upgrade it to rape and throw in a few more charges here and there to create confusion and later on they add another charge like maintaining a sexual relationship with a child under the age of 16. But get this!!! They do yanks style plea bargaining as they say to your legal team WE WILL DROP ALL CHARGES AGAINST YOUR CLIENT IF YOU AGREE TO THE MAINTAINING RELATIONSHIP CHARGE AND PLEAD GUILTY ON THAT ONE. They do this to just about everyone. Look at the trial going on now with that school teacher (Name withheld) she had around 229 charges against her and now the prosecution have decided to combined it to just one charge of Maintaining a sexual relationship with a child under the age of 16 (I think CODE 229B). WHAT A LOT OF SHIT!!! They charge you with rape and the crown decides to drop the charges if you agree to the others, which one is it crown? If you charge a person with a charge then you drop it means in my eyes that you falsely charged that person in the first place. They play a game that always suits themselves.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Hi,
Well male child is nearly 6 and still gate crashes my shower! He has his toys and gets in their and plays and couldn't care less about my nakedness. OooooOOOOOHH,,, don't tell DOCS this!!This is a NO,NO with them
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
You know how sick the world has come today. Years ago my youngest soiled it pants at school when the child was 7 years old. The school rang home we were not home, The school rang my mobile but I was in a area with poor mobile phone reception and the school didn't speak to us so the child stayed in the sick bay area for 4 hours before they got in contact with us. Nobody in this sick fuck of a school tried to clean my child up you sick bastards and this alone warrants a child abuse charge to be put to the head master of that school.
I was only talking about this to my sister the other day and she reminded me that back in our days in a Catholic school if a child shit itself and the child was young they would take the young child to the shower and clean the mess up and most of the time they carried a arrangement of different size of undies for boys or girls + spare uniforms. The same for an older child at school as accidents do happen except the older children had to cleaned themselves but in all cases the school ALWAYS had spare clothes.
Today the schools are full of female teachers yet nobody did nothing to clean my child up, The teachers today are are scared and just sick in the head. What woman or a mother in a school as a school teacher could leave any child with shit in its pants for hours like they did for our child.
Last edited by I Hate GOV, DEPT; Wed 05 Nov 2008 04:49:PM.
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 131
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 131 |
I get your point I hate gov, but its the way we have become. You would think that a school full of female teachers would have attended to a child in need. And as for your point on no males in school anymore well this is the reason why the education system is not as good as what it was years ago.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Their sick and probably following guidelines from the Education Dept I bet if it was one of their or their friends kids they would have acted differently.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
My last partner was a School teacher. She is suppose to be educated to understand the needs of the child/ren. her net name was midnightrose_74(you can do a google on the name,also try Snak3). we were together about a yr.she was with me 24/7,she saw everything i did. we were,as I quoted, ALL good,but not alright. good,cos we had a relationship.not alright,cos of the dogs at DOCS. this woman for a yr stood beside me, she screamed out the immoral attitude from Docs. Until the 29th of Aug. at 1:30am. her love for me turn to hate. DOCS in toowmooba, Frked her mind up so bad with the help of her so called christian parents. Brainwashed her till she hit depression.the child went into kinship to her parents. and to have no contact with the said child. but! where does she live,?. with her parents. which means she got to hold him,play with him and watch him grow. I,in turn dont even know what he looks like. I have a rule. I dont 2 time, I dont drink and I dont hit in anger or abuse in any manner.
That one day is one day to far and long, each day is no different, same pains, same hurts,same nightmares. its been since 2003, that frking 5 hurtful frking yrs of DOCS playing god with me. 3 children came into this world for naught. 2 partners that was ripped away and love murdered.
What price value can anybody place on this??
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42
Astronaut Level 1
|
Astronaut Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42 |
I can see what you are all saying and i completly agree. At my daughters school they have 4 male teachers and 1 executive male teacher and a male janitor out of a total of about 25 staff.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
your lucky!!! My ???????????? primary school has only 2 male teachers.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
Not only are the Department watching...but they're members too!
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 386
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 386 |
one would be a fool to think that wasnt the case justice
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
Really, they still here.. When all this 1st started to happen to me. A notion hit me, in this way.
What if these scums, was using us a test lab rabbit/rat.
Place us in a maze and watch to see if we can find our way out, the closer you got to the end, the more hurdles they would add to it.
If these slimy cops are here reading and watching. remember this. You to can also be placed in this maze, For DOCS are above the law, DOCS can even placed them in here with us.
No one is safe, No man, or family, is safe from these dogs, and as soon as these cops get out of the kitty litter and smell the roses, NO action will ever take place.
I am still here MR policeman. I still want a interview and questioning by you to the claims of your masters.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Not only are the Department watching...but they're members too! Are they? Well its good to see they were the ones that voted for the poll of the most hated Government Department HAAAA! You have to laugh that moles that work for DOCS are voting against these office because if you look you will see that nobody voted in favor of their office so I think that blows that theory out the window. For those that do know this site aus-city.com has a very sophisticated control panel that allows Admins to check who is who + a hundred things more and I'm not saying more. By the way I'm responsible so far for two getting the sack from their government computer so don't think you can't be caught.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
I wonder who will be Number 3
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 386
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 386 |
THAT WOULD COMPOUND THEIR ALREADY STAFFING PROBLEM WOULDNT IT HEHEHEHE
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 32
Astronaut Level 1
|
Astronaut Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 32 |
Not only are the Department watching...but they're members too! If JusticeForAll is talking about DoCs joining the forum well i think she has put her foot in it as if I was a DoCs worker and I joined this forum I would have voted for DoCs not against them.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
That's if she was talking about DOCS because as you said if I was DOCS on this public site using their home computer I would have voted in favor of DOCS which nobody did. Ohhh sorry Julie did.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
Not only are the Department watching...but they're members too! If JusticeForAll is talking about DoCs joining the forum well i think she has put her foot in it as if I was a DoCs worker and I joined this forum I would have voted for DoCs not against them. How exactly have I put my foot in it and what exactly am I putting my foot in??
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515 |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Not only are the Department watching...but they're members too! JusticeForAll saying the above sort of contradicts the poll. "EXAMPLE"!!! Out of the 292 that polled the main poll say if 20 of them were DOCS CSO's that have joined the aus-city forum but have never posted EVER (the ones I have emailed) and if this is the case why didn't any of them poll in favor of Child Safety because if I worked in Child Safety and was a member of this forum I would have voted for them without a problem. There was only two votes totally in favor of DOCS and that was Julie and her proxy server service.(one vote on each poll in favor of DOCS) Not unless we have DOCS CSO's that have voted against their office, oooOOOOhhhHHH I didn't think of that one! Maybe its the 800+ that have resigned from DOCS for whatever reason this year. YES ALL 800 + have resigned from the Department of Child safety this year alone. Around 500 last year
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Not unless we have DOCS CSO's that have voted against their office, oooOOOOhhhHHH I didn't think of that one! Maybe its the 800+ that have resigned from DOCS for whatever reason this year. YES ALL 800 + have resigned from the Department of Child safety this year alone. Around 500 last year
Please! any DOCS CSO's on this site too scared to become public and post on this forum but polled against Child Safety and have a story to tell please PM me.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 345
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 345 |
Not only are the Department watching...but they're members too! JusticeForAll saying the above sort of contradicts the poll. "EXAMPLE"!!! Out of the 292 that polled the main poll say if 20 of them were DOCS CSO's that have joined the aus-city forum but have never posted EVER (the ones I have emailed) and if this is the case why didn't any of them poll in favor of Child Safety because if I worked in Child Safety and was a member of this forum I would have voted for them without a problem. There was only two votes totally in favor of DOCS and that was Julie and her proxy server service.(one vote on each poll in favor of DOCS) Not unless we have DOCS CSO's that have voted against their office, oooOOOOhhhHHH I didn't think of that one! Maybe its the 800+ that have resigned from DOCS for whatever reason this year. YES ALL 800 + have resigned from the Department of Child safety this year alone. Around 500 last year As you would say, you have hit the nail on the head.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352 |
ha ha ha, I think that is so funny - did Julie really vote in favour of docs or did i read this incorrectly? ha ha ha
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Yes, her IP number attached to her in the control panel was attached to her voting yes on both of those polls. But whats got me wondering, i definitely think now we might have some DOCS silent members in the forum that have voted against their office because i have picked up a few Government IP's which were attached to a poll but i cannot tell which one (Too much data to read). Now we all know there was virtually zilch voting for DOCS so they must have voted against them.
How interesting! Again specific IP numbers were matched with the poll and they did vote but i didnt see anyone except Julie voting with DOCS so they must've voted against DOCS. Wouldnt you like to get your hands on these people for a few days? Nothing worse than a disgrunted woman scorned.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
YES I KNOW ITS IN THE WRONG THREAD! But why not.
Guys and Gals, since our great Premier is on the money grab trail again and she is short a bit of cash by giving it all to the Department of Child Safety, by increasing fines for everything including of course traffic fines, I would like to remind all what is written below and what I have been reading on other sites, where more and more people are now warning motorists with these speed cameras. See, if you flash your head lights, they grab you for that, by using your high beams in a built up area, but if you just turn your head lights on and off and on and off, is that breaking the law? Well not the law of using your high beams in a built up area, but unfortunately this gangster of a Premier that we have has her own law, which is worse than any other law we have in this state and you know what thats called:
DENYING THE GOVERNMENT REVENUE.
(JUST A REMINDER TO WHAT HAPPENED A WHILE A GO)
Well watching Channel Nine News last night (15/10//07)I just caught a segment about Queensland police getting caught in their own speed cameras. It was interesting once again thanks to the freedom of information ACT and a good reporter that reported this but I would like to add my two bobs worth. See what attracted my attention to this story was the high percentage of police whilst on or possibly off duty that were booked for speeding but it was the case of an outrageous percentage of them that write a letter to the department with a reason why they were speeding and they get off. Now as I said I just caught this story by a second so I don't exactly remember the percentage that get off but it was high and I can tell you this that the average Tom Dick and Harry that has been caught speeding has got BUCKLEY'S chance of getting off as easy as the off or on duty Police do so how do they do it? Haaaaaa easy!!
No I'm not saying where I got this info from but some of us unfortunately have relatives or friend in the Police service and yes they do enjoy a drink at a BBQ and yes the drink has a habit of loosening a few tongues and this is what I over heard at a Bathurst 1000 party that got my ears ringing. See what is getting around the traps in the Police service is just say an off or on duty Police officer is driving his or her private or Police car on a public road and in a split second they unfortunately get zapped by a speed camera for speeding and they know that they have been busted what they do is accelerate and pull over the first car that just happen to be in front of them. Now they will pull the car over for any reason like Sir/Madam why were you drifting in your lane, or your brake light are coming on and off or whatever stupid or silly reason they can use to pull the car in front of them over so they can get details, times and whatever needed so the off or on duty cop can write his or her letter saying this was the reason why he or she was speeding. I find this what I heard absolutely disgusting and outrageous that we have a law for the common person and we have a loophole for the Police. What I would like for the General public to do is if you pass a speed camera and you are not speeding whatsoever and for some reason just after or kms later down the road you get pulled over for whatever reason by anyone on or off duty and they just happens to flash a badge at you and ask for your details which you give him or her ask for his or her name and service number (They could refuse or ask why?), also get details, time, "etc" of the car they are driving and number plate and report them to the CMC (Crimes Misconduct Commission)You never know you could be lucky, See if the CMC investigate and it just happens the Police officer gives them the same excuse (I bet the excuses would be similiar)as they put in their letter to get off the fine the CMC will know that the Police Officer in question is on the nose, and after this message on this forum gets around they might think twice before pulling this swifty again. Remember all, the way I look at it the Police are not above the law and they should be treated equally like the rest of us. Now let me see where is the phone number for the CMC.
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13 |
If perchance the police are trawling this site the idea that it is a simple plod doing this doesn't add up to me whatsoever.
What I personally find far more likely is that a task force at the policy dept is monitoring all negative communication. Most govt dept's have people who do this and often blog under Mary Smith or whatever at the large daily's.
Fortunately these people are often exposed, and then a large number in any specific forum turn on them on mass.
Serves them right.
Going to the CMC (Cleared Mate Cleared) wont stop this alleged trawling or trolling- their job is to create as little embarassment as possible for the QLD govt.
Case in point: CMC heavied 20 previous complainants about Hurley into withdrawing their complaint.
Last edited by DoCS_R_Dogs; Tue 11 Nov 2008 12:19:PM.
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13 |
spelling mistake was the reason for the edit in case your wondering
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
who's worried about spelling mistakes, i'm full of them.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
If perchance the police are trawling this site the idea that it is a simple plod doing this doesn't add up to me whatsoever.
What I personally find far more likely is that a task force at the policy dept is monitoring all negative communication. Most govt dept's have people who do this and often blog under Mary Smith or whatever at the large daily's.
Fortunately these people are often exposed, and then a large number in any specific forum turn on them on mass.
Serves them right.
Going to the CMC (Cleared Mate Cleared) wont stop this alleged trawling or trolling- their job is to create as little embarassment as possible for the QLD govt.
Case in point: CMC heavied 20 previous complainants about Hurley into withdrawing their complaint. A mate of mine bagged telstra for months and they eventually contacted him and solved the problem. Now all this was on a public forum where a new member joined but was actually someone in the Telstra management
|
|
Forums60
Topics720,891
Posts755,507
Members2,958
|
Most Online4,158 Jun 21st, 2024
|
|
|
|
Copyright 1996 - 2024 by David Cottle. Designed by David Bate Jr. All Rights Reserved.
By using this forum, the user agrees not to transfer any data or technical information received under the agreement, to any other entity without the express approval of the AUS-CITY Forum Admins and/or authors of individual posts (Forum Admins and DoD/USSPACECOM for the analysis of satellite tracking data).
Two-line elements (TLE) and all other satellite data presented and distributed via this forum and e-mail lists of AUS-CITY are distributed with permission from DoD/USSTRATCOM.
Reprise Hosting
|
|