|
0 members (),
5,319
guests, and
20
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
M 4.7 - 85 km W of Petrolia, CA
• M 1.3 - 12 km N of Cabazon, CA
• M 1.3 - 12 km N of Cabazon, CA
• M 1.3 - 12 km N of Cabazon, CA
• M 1.3 - 12 km N of Cabazon, CA
• M 4.3 - 19 km SSW of Roncesvalles, Colombia
• M 4.3 - 19 km SSW of Roncesvalles, Colombia
|
#26689
Mon 06 Mar 2006 02:01:PM
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 95,828
Launch Director
|
|
Launch Director
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 95,828 |
Thanks for posting, Dave! <img border="0" alt="[All Hail]" title="" src="graemlins/default/all_hail.gif" /> I was hoping to eventually lure your into the metaphysical forum. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/default/wink.gif" /> I was thinking you might post about the stance from the space agencies that these photos were faked. But you came up with something much better.<br /><br />I am not very versed in the layout of galaxies so I am happy to rely on your expertise. Does this mean that the SOHO satellite could not have taken this photo? I was trusting it to be legitimate because it was in the newspapers <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/default/rolleyes.gif" /> and on the UFO sites I read that I feel are legitimate.<br /><br />I am willing to be wrong on this being legitimate, though it is not hard for me to believe it to be true with all of the thousands of "UFO" photos, video, and even greater number of believable experiences people have related regarding alien visitors.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics840,339
Posts875,134
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|