Good man? I think NOT!

The news reports are exceptionally misleading unless you bother with the actual fine print

If you read the entire fiasco Wood ran at his masters behest you may form a different view of this dodgy fool (lets remember that he let hundreds of dodgy police escape any punishment during his 97 Royal Commission)

He also allowed a paedophile caseworker named DZ escape ANY punishment for paying his child clients money to have SEX WITH HIM on the grounds of procedural fairness- bugger the CHILD victims altogether!

During the latest fiasco the "special inquiry" 600+ submissions from the public were suppressed by this wood puppet as it would embarrass the govt no end- the australian newspaper reported that the Inquiry had descended into farce. He's friends with Debus the former AG that shuffled off to Fed politics, but said he was giving Wood the easy jobs.

He also held 2 of these dodgy circuses at once- the one has D notices over all of it and nothing at all has come out of it- especially how much Wood was paid to run each of these PR missions.



Lets remember that he is the one who runs the NSW Sentencing council and simply regurgitates the govt's view- he is simply digging a hole of the govt's liability and moving it to another dept hopelessly failing and completely and utterly unable to keep its own end up according to the Garling Report. In short Sussex St has its hand up his @#*$e!!!!!

How independent can anyone be SEEN to be when they hold these other roles?

The only thing that will happen out of this Wood debacle is that there is now an absolute tangle between Mental Hellth and the brighter futures regime (that will ensure darker futures all round in reality)is that the accountability has been shuffled off DoCS books.

Doesn't mean that less kids will die- quite the contrary it means more will die and the govt will have a new run around policy regaridng accountability that's all- and less qualified people from dingbat local organisations that haven't the skills to cope will be foisted with the responsibility when the govt knows full well that they will not be able to cope.

Oh and finally he was the same "wise judge" that disallowed a HUGE amount of evidence against Burrell that killed those women. He would not allow key evidence into the 2nd murder trial whatsoever. Now Burrell is making an appeal and the stuff that Wood chucked out of being admissable can not be brought up against him in any appeal.

CLASSIC! Wood is on the side of the villains- make no mistake about it
And he is as dodgy as the day is LONG in the Artic summer.