|
|
|
0 members (),
1,506
guests, and
23
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
M 6.5 - 177 km W of Nikolski, Alaska
• M 1.2 - 6 km W of Orcas, Washington
• M 0.8 - 86 km NNW of Karluk, Alaska
• M 1.4 - 49 km N of Valdez, Alaska
• M 3.2 - 2 km SW of Signal Hill, CA
• M 1.7 - 49 km SSE of Nelchina, Alaska
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 95,830
Launch Director
|
|
Launch Director
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 95,830 |
Thanks for sharing this. I hadn't heard it before.  She's good. But I'm with you...what the heck is disputable about this opinion she sings of?  If some people don't see through the ruse of the "war", then actually, Explicit seems the right label for this song.  From Wiki: Explicit (from Latin explicare, "to unfold" and thus also make visible)  Be careful, you might see unfolding some information that conflicts with the spoonfed dogma you've received about the necessity and good-cause of the war.  So let the babies attach their label to this song. Little do their tiny minds know how well it fits. Besides, nothing stops the truth from being revealed to the clever people who seek to find it.  Certainly not labels that say "explicit" - that just makes us all the more curiouser to have a look! 
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics865,780
Posts900,576
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|