|
|
|
0 members (),
1,517
guests, and
24
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
M 5.3 - 151 km WSW of Adak, Alaska
• M 1.8 - 26 km SSW of South Dos Palos, CA
• M 2.2 - 57 km S of Whites City, New Mexico
• M 4.7 - 33 km SW of SipÃ, Colombia
• M 6.6 - 115 km NNE of Teluknaga, Indonesia
• M 4.2 - 5 km SE of Ilihan, Philippines
• M 0.8 - 8 km NW of The Geysers, CA
|
#489622
Fri 08 Feb 2019 06:35:PM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 678,977
Launch Director
|
|
Launch Director
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 678,977 |
In a 5-4 decision, Justice John Roberts sided with the court’s progressive wing to grant an emergency stay blocking enforcement of Louisiana’s admitting-privileges law. The Louisiana law appeared to violate a recent Supreme Court precedent called Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, which struck down a nearly identical Texas law. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, surprisingly upheld the Louisiana law, holding that there were enough factual differences between Louisiana and Texas to render the Louisiana law less burdensome on abortion rights.
Source: An Ominous Moment for the Pro-Life Movement
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Entire Thread
|
An Ominous Moment for the Pro-Life Movement
|
Webmaster
|
Fri 08 Feb 2019 06:35:PM
|
|
Forums60
Topics825,281
Posts860,074
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|