|
0 members (),
259
guests, and
23
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
#10162
Tue 07 Sep 2004 03:25:PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8
Space Trainee
|
OP
Space Trainee
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8 |
is it true that the 2.4 solid AZURE SHINE antenna perform equaly as the 3 meter mesh antenna? and which is better?<br />I wanted to buy a biger antenna to recieve Asiasat 3S I'll really appreciate your reply guys.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
#10163
Tue 07 Sep 2004 05:06:PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
Astronaut Level 1
|
Astronaut Level 1
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25 |
Generally, the bigger dish has more gain, but there isn't much difference between 2.4 and 3m.<br />The solid dish may have a better surface accuracy<br />(I have seen some that are worse).<br />A solid dish usually is more acceptable for weak Ku Band signals. So I guess it comes down to the price and which bands you want to use.<br /> If you're only ever going to use C band on this antenna, then mesh. If you are considering using Ku, then you should consider the solid.
|
|
#10164
Wed 08 Sep 2004 03:45:AM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,142
Assistant Launch Director
|
Assistant Launch Director
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,142 |
|
|
#10165
Wed 08 Sep 2004 05:43:AM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8
Space Trainee
|
OP
Space Trainee
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8 |
If you're only ever going to use C band on this antenna, then mesh. If you are considering using Ku, then you should consider the solid.<br /><br /><br />could you please explain what makes the difference for C and Ku band used on either the solid or the mesh antena?
|
|
#10166
Wed 08 Sep 2004 07:49:AM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
Astronaut Level 1
|
Astronaut Level 1
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25 |
You can easily use C-band on a Ku dish of the same size. But generally not the other way around. In practice Ku Band does work on C-band dishes, but the mesh dish is not as efficent in reflecting Ku band signals as it is C band.<br />Think of it like the difference between using a mirror or just shiney metal to reflect light.<br />The mirror is just a better reflector.<br /><br />The next consideration is surface accuracy.<br />The wavelength is longer at C band so it is a little more tollerant of imperfections.<br />A dish may have kinks, dints and warps in it, these will effect Ku band gain more than C band.<br />Radiation is being scattered instead of being reflected where you want it to go.<br /><br /> If you think of it in terms of mirrors and light.<br />If a mirror is perfectly flat, the picture reflected is nice and clear. But if the mirror is warped, then your head may look bigger than your body.<br /><br />In simple terms you can use a solid dish for Ku and C band, but a mesh dish for C band (or lower)only.
|
|
#10167
Wed 08 Sep 2004 08:59:PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8
Space Trainee
|
OP
Space Trainee
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8 |
|
|
#10168
Wed 08 Sep 2004 10:09:PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3 |
Hi, So if I want to recieve CBAND only which Dish is better the 2.5 solid or 3m mesh???
|
|
#10169
Fri 10 Sep 2004 06:45:PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
Astronaut Level 1
|
Astronaut Level 1
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25 |
I'd go the 3m. Others might say otherwise, personal choice might have more to do with the selection rather than the difference in gain :-)
|
|
#10170
Fri 24 Sep 2004 12:19:AM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2 |
Is there any use in trying to receive any Cband signals on a 95cm solid (offset dish) dish that is currently only used in KUband?<br />If this is possible, How can one add a KU LNB to this and what LNB would be usable. <br />Appreciate any positive replies.<br />Nahon
|
|
#10171
Fri 24 Sep 2004 12:29:AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,815
Mission Commander
|
Mission Commander
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,815 |
95cm would be to small for c-band you wouldt get much well you would get nothing you need minimum 2.3m mesh
|
|
#10172
Fri 24 Sep 2004 07:21:AM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11 |
I know of one case where MTV on Pas8 C band was received on a 90cm but that is about it. <br /><br />1.5-1.8m will get a few more channels but it really opens up with a 2.3m+.
|
|
#10173
Fri 24 Sep 2004 08:12:PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2 |
Thanks for the replies folks, That is that idea down the drain. Ciouncil will not allow me to raise a dish that size. Nahon
|
|
#10174
Sat 25 Sep 2004 02:39:AM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,142
Assistant Launch Director
|
Assistant Launch Director
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,142 |
|
|
#10175
Wed 22 Dec 2004 06:43:PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 162
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 162 |
so what can get beside pas8 and optusb3...with the dish?
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7
Space Trainee
|
Space Trainee
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7 |
iF im right or wrong this threat was past history  2004. I believe at least 2.3mesh dish is far better then other levels.<br /><br />I have 2 satellite dishes.. One is a 2.4mesh dish but strong frame and was bought in 2000. While the new dish i recently got is very very light and could easily break if not too carefully but allways coution when hail apears in summer times and it is a 2.3mesh dish. Was told these days know in 2006 the 2.3mesh dish is very good and people buy them, But your could correct me if that isn't true.<br /><br />I believe larger dish will just make no differents either it is a 2.3mesh dish but perhaps its just signal strenth differents but you get the same packages on each satellites available with a good receiver.<br /><br /><br /><br />regards<br />Pascual
|
|
Forums60
Topics724,570
Posts759,186
Members2,958
|
Most Online4,158 Jun 21st, 2024
|
|
|
|
Copyright 1996 - 2024 by David Cottle. Designed by David Bate Jr. All Rights Reserved.
By using this forum, the user agrees not to transfer any data or technical information received under the agreement, to any other entity without the express approval of the AUS-CITY Forum Admins and/or authors of individual posts (Forum Admins and DoD/USSPACECOM for the analysis of satellite tracking data).
Two-line elements (TLE) and all other satellite data presented and distributed via this forum and e-mail lists of AUS-CITY are distributed with permission from DoD/USSTRATCOM.
Reprise Hosting
|
|