0 members (),
594
guests, and
28
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
#39932
Sat 18 Oct 2008 04:16:AM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
Australia is divided, The laws from state to state differs. The most damaging is the law on AGE. Government in their retarded thinking, Cant fathom the notion to what is a Adult. So! lets go though a few. 1: At 14 yrs old, Paying adult fees to the movies. 2: At 16 yrs old, You can smoke but cant buy them, You can obtain a license to drive a car in South Australia and become a killer or be killed.Yet 16 and above, you can have consented sex 3: At 17 yrs old you can be placed in a prison. 4: Your still a child to center link at 25 yrs old, Providing you live with a Parent and still go to school.
Its these retarded laws on What is a Adult, that now have Children thinking they can be a adult, Cos! the government said so.
DOCS/Family SA, Or any penis smokers who claim to be a Child safety worker, Are the Australian Nazi's of child/ren stealers.
Now what gets me, Is that we all attack DOCS and rightly so. But!?, Who gave them that power?. Who gave them the Frking sting right to march into your home and rip you away from your family? Who? Would pass such a law.?. The Government of Australia. from Rudd to a redneck DocS worker. Its Rudd that we are abused by his Nazis. Not your State MP, But, RUDD, If you can Quote 'NO One is above the law', Why are DOCS?. If Rudd can say sorry to the stolen generation,and then pay a compensation to them, Then he can amend the Nazis law of DOCS. If Rudd's Deputy can Quote 'We have a fair justice system'...... Where??? I have never seen it.
How many 14/15/16 yr old females are pregnant >?. That came from consented sex?. Whether the man is 17 or 77, He is now branded a pedophile and DOCS will twist this all the way to a new born. When this man then trys to build a family or obtains a ready made family. DOCS will come and rip it apart. and Rudd backs them.
Yes! docs are just the tool to Rudd.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 148
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 148 |
What you have mentioned above is so true, why do they have so many different rules for different ages, and not only that different states in Australia.
The Government have certainly frked up on this one, especially when the Department is concerned. Try asking the Government to help you when Docs are HARASSING You... They dont even want to know.
Doesnt it make you wonder....... if we are having troubles as parents now, imagine what it would be like for our childrens children, we have no rights now, and I cant see it getting any better in the future. And whom is to blame.....THE GOVERNMENT!!!!!!
What happened to Innocent until proven guilty
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 181
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 181 |
Here's a classic for you on consenusal sex at age 16, my dtr is 15 1/2 and for her to be able to have underage sex, Dchs paid and encouraged Implanon but then carry on about her being sexually active but mind you she is in care and has been for a year...no rights for me...because they say she was gillick competent to make up her own mind and make her own choices...
Contradictory and hypocritical of the government but that's always how the governments been!
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
I always thought Queensland was the most retarded state going, Now Family SA is following the retards of Queensland Nazi's attitude. I have committed no crimes in the State of SA. Only what Family SA gave me. In the 10 months of a relationship with the partner and children, Not once was there any form of abuse to this family. In the 20 minutes that Family SA invaded my home, They abused the whole family. I saw NO difference tween the Retards of Queensland and Now Family SA. I can only Guess, that ALL of Australia Penis Smokers (DOCS)are just as retarded. The age factor that the government enforces to what is a adult are so out of date. Government then orders that all schools must now teach Sex to children. No wonder children want to try to have sex as young as 12 yrs old. What to try some form of drugs. Family values are nomore, Howard removed all rights from parents,Howard is the bastard that started all this and now Rudd (the clone to howard)is no better.
I would like to play roll reversals say with Rudd. I would love to march into his home and tell him he cant be there in the family home.I would love to do to those as they have done to me and my family. I would love to see the pains and the hurts in their faces as i see mine everyday.
There is NO future while we have retards governing us.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 32
Astronaut Level 1
|
Astronaut Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 32 |
There is NO future while we have retards governing us.
No truer words ever spoken and all I hope is I can be like some of you that have or are going through this mess right now or have a long time ago. My Solicitor has told me it effects all differently, as he said he has seen the most gentle person become a tyrant against Child Safety after having their day in court and winning.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Australia is divided, The laws from state to state differs. The most damaging is the law on AGE. Government in their retarded thinking, Cant fathom the notion to what is a Adult. So! lets go though a few. 1: At 14 yrs old, Paying adult fees to the movies. 2: At 16 yrs old, You can smoke but cant buy them, You can obtain a license to drive a car in South Australia and become a killer or be killed.Yet 16 and above, you can have consented sex 3: At 17 yrs old you can be placed in a prison. 4: Your still a child to center link at 25 yrs old, Providing you live with a Parent and still go to school.
Its these retarded laws on What is a Adult, that now have Children thinking they can be a adult, Cos! the government said so.
DOCS/Family SA, Or any penis smokers who claim to be a Child safety worker, Are the Australian Nazi's of child/ren stealers.
Now what gets me, Is that we all attack DOCS and rightly so. But!?, Who gave them that power?. Who gave them the Frking sting right to march into your home and rip you away from your family? Who? Would pass such a law.?. The Government of Australia. from Rudd to a redneck DocS worker. Its Rudd that we are abused by his Nazis. Not your State MP, But, RUDD, If you can Quote 'NO One is above the law', Why are DOCS?. If Rudd can say sorry to the stolen generation,and then pay a compensation to them, Then he can amend the Nazis law of DOCS. If Rudd's Deputy can Quote 'We have a fair justice system'...... Where??? I have never seen it.
How many 14/15/16 yr old females are pregnant >?. That came from consented sex?. Whether the man is 17 or 77, He is now branded a pedophile and DOCS will twist this all the way to a new born. When this man then trys to build a family or obtains a ready made family. DOCS will come and rip it apart. and Rudd backs them.
Yes! docs are just the tool to Rudd.
I say this to all Its good to see you here but I m sorry you have anything to do with this SCUM of the earth DOCS. By any chance did you read from day one my opening post that the most hated government department was the department of Child safety? Did you see the bit that Kevin Rudd said sorry for the stolen generation? well I wonder who will say sorry for our stolen generation. Personally they (pollies) can all get fucked, I don't want their sorry I want Dollars and Cents, that the type of sorry I want.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
I say this to all Its good to see you here but I m sorry you have anything to do with this SCUM of the earth DOCS. By any chance did you read from day one my opening post that the most hated government department was the department of Child safety? Did you see the bit that Kevin Rudd said sorry for the stolen generation? well I wonder who will say sorry for our stolen generation. Personally they (pollies) can all get fucked, I don't want their sorry I want Dollars and Cents, that the type of sorry I want. [/quote]
Yes, I have read, and Yes, I know full well of how DOCS conducts business. Yes! I want that justice to, that ends up in compensation of the said abuse upon myself. Yes!! I also have documents handed to me by DOCS of their corruption and file tampering. Another Forde Inquiry is needed. The laws on " Child stealing to be amended ". The laws that DOCS have now 'untouchable' and above the law. to accountable in a court of law. There is no point attacking the retards(DOCS) they are controlled by Rudd, Rudd is the head of this cancer infected government body. Rudd turns a blind eye to DOCS activities,Until DOCS make the Headlines,even then he only covers up for them. From what I see here, there is over 2000 people. thats 2000 of us that can protest at their front door and obtain media coverage world wide. This I believe Rudd will not want. But our voice of this abuse needs to be Echoed for all to hear.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 32
Astronaut Level 1
|
Astronaut Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 32 |
This is a state matter docs as I think it has nothing to do with federal arena.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 32
Astronaut Level 1
|
Astronaut Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 32 |
Yes, I have read, and Yes, I know full well of how DOCS conducts business. Yes! I want that justice to, that ends up in compensation of the said abuse upon myself. Yes!! I also have documents handed to me by DOCS of their corruption and file tampering. Another Forde Inquiry is needed. The laws on " Child stealing to be amended ". The laws that DOCS have now 'untouchable' and above the law. to accountable in a court of law. There is no point attacking the retards(DOCS) they are controlled by Rudd, Rudd is the head of this cancer infected government body. Rudd turns a blind eye to DOCS activities,Until DOCS make the Headlines,even then he only covers up for them. From what I see here, there is over 2000 people. thats 2000 of us that can protest at their front door and obtain media coverage world wide. This I believe Rudd will not want. But our voice of this abuse needs to be Echoed for all to hear.
I fully agree that the above have to be amended.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
This is a state matter docs as I think it has nothing to do with federal arena.
Oh! but it is a Federal matter. The family law act is Australia wide and as of this year DOCS can now interact with all states to pass information. Its the tosser in power now, Rudd, and his upper and lower house that can amend laws of the Family act that howard changed when he placed his Hoof in parliament. The buck passing stops with Rudd. He is now accountable for the actions of any, ANY government body in Australia that breaks the law in any manner.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
This is a state matter docs as I think it has nothing to do with federal arena.
You're right endofdays. DOCS is goverened by STATE government, not Federal government. The State senate are responsible for governing, maintaining and running DOCS. The State government report information to the Federal government about DOCS, but all decisions are made by the Queensland Government. as of this year DOCS can now interact with all states to pass information. While DOCS now have powers to share information with other state child protection organisations, this does not change the fact that Anna Bligh is responsible for DOCS in queensland. DOCS has also always been able to share information with other States and has always done so. The new changes are in relation to the stream lining of sharing this information. Its the tosser in power now, Rudd, and his upper and lower house that can amend laws of the Family act that howard changed when he placed his Hoof in parliament. The Family Law Act is not used by DOCS and has no involvement with DOCS. I'm not sure what changing this Law will do to stop the problems with DOCS. I'm sure however that if there was enough of a stink Rudd may become involved.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
[quote=DocSniper]How many 14/15/16 yr old females are pregnant >?. That came from consented sex?. Whether the man is 17 or 77[quote]
The Queensland Criminal Code clearly outlines this one.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
then where does it say, that having consented sex with say a 15 or 16 yr old girl, when did that become PEDOPHILIA ?.
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 181
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 181 |
Point, when did it become PEDOPHILIA if it's consented sex?
If a teenage girl is under the age of 16 and is having consensual sex with a person over the age of 16, the person if it became known to the police have a right of duty to charge the person with something but is it PEDOPHILIA? Well that's what I've been advised from DChS.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
Even though the child under the age of 16 has consented to having sex with the person over the age of 16, the law does not consider it to be consentual because the person is in fact a child.
According to the Crime and Misconduct Commission "Paedophilia is criminal activity involving sexual offences against children by adults". However the American Psychology Association (APA) define paedophilia as "recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviours involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger)."
They would be charged with Carnal Knowledge of a child under the age of 16 years, and possibly Maintinaing a relationship with a child under the age of 16 years.
There is no charge called Paedophilia, there are charges related to the above mentioned as well as indecent treatment of a child, procuring a child for carnal knowledge etc.
My question is (and it may cause a stir) What is an adult doing having sex with a child in the first place??
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
ahhhh! but to DChs or DOCS that 16 or under girl that gave consented sex is just the same as a 18 yr old. for DChs or DOCS class children to 18 yrs of age. But is having sex with that 16 yr old female A heading for PEDOPHILIA ?. to DChs/DOCS yes!. But, why then does the rest of the government Say its ok for a 16 yr old to have Sex?, to drive a car ?. Why is their a division with in the same government concerning the age factor to a child(15/16) to having consented sex ?.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
My question is (and it may cause a stir) What is an adult doing having sex with a child in the first place??
Well as you well know, some girls at 14-15-16 can act and look way older then they do. Then you may have that male that knows she is 15/16, and lust takes over. Then you may obtain some males that only look for that 15/16 yr old. Thats asking for trouble. But then you have them sick puppies that will hunt children,boy or girl.these are the pricks that need to be hunted and brought to justice. Like Dennis Ferguson, No one argues the point concerning him. hes a sick puppies. Then theres some males(very small amount) that get entrapped by that 15/16 yr old female. Its this entrapment that triggers off a life of hell.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Maintinaing a relationship with a child under the age of 16 years. The pigs love that one, its a new one as they don't need any evidence whatsoever to have you charged with this one just a 93a
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
All a child hasto do is put a complain in and if they say the child has been there more than once thus gives them the option for maintaining a relationship. See the Corrupt system sits down with the Attorney General scamming new ways to introduce new laws to give them a conviction.
I have something to say and I will say it after my trial that will rock the legal system, I bet you what I have founds not a single person in Qld has done anything similar and its Legal as I asked my Lawyer and he said go for it and said very clearly only you could have thought of that but even he doesn't know the magic end and how many times and whilst in Court I also asked the Deputy Sheriff, and told her what i wanted to do, something,some,something and she said GO FOR IT. So don't ask because my finding will shock you. The public needs to be educated, but for me its I want to be a big THORN in the enemies side.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
Maintinaing a relationship with a child under the age of 16 years. The pigs love that one, its a new one as they don't need any evidence whatsoever to have you charged with this one just a 93a This is a tad odd for 93a as my children cant even talk let alone walk. my 1st son was taking at 3 days old in 2005 in 2006 the partner is pregnant again to me and they retake the 1st child and i didnt get to see the other child, then in 2007 to another partner,my son is born at 1:06 am and by 1:30am, I am surrounded by 5 cops as they removed the new born and marched me out of the hospital, That was the last time i saw my son and the mother of him. What they used on me is 10a they here in SA, are also using 10a to abused the family being built. they, the said children of this relationship, have no problems with me, these children speak up for me, and these children openly state. ' we are not being abused in any way by this man ': yet in the best interest DOCS have said concerns, Even when I and the partner and the children can prove there is NO abuse. DOCS turns a blind eye to it. Yet, I and the partner know when this hits the court room, we have the proof to give to the judge.
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 246
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 246 |
JusticeForall Are you somehow involved with the above? Your knowledge is good on these matters as some of the Lawyers here in Melbourne have been reading your replies with accuracy. With that charge you have above named: Maintaining a relationship with a child under the age of 16 years, you forgot to put the word sexual in between A and Relationship. Like I hate Govern Dept said its a new charge Australia wide, trumped up to get more conviction because of the amount of young girls having willing consensual sex with an older person.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
JusticeForall Are you somehow involved with the above? Your knowledge is good on these matters as some of the Lawyers here in Melbourne have been reading your replies with accuracy. No not involved with the above from a legal or Police point of view, but I have had some involvement in other indirect ways. I'd also like to think that I'm an educated person who does their research. With that charge you have above named: Maintaining a relationship with a child under the age of 16 years, you forgot to put the word sexual in between A and Relationship. You're correct I did miss out the word sexual while typing the post. Thank you for picking up on that. The word sexual in that sentence does make a lot of difference between the two and I would hate to be giving the wrong information to members. Like I hate Govern Dept said its a new charge Australia wide, trumped up to get more conviction because of the amount of young girls having willing consensual sex with an older person. Yes I'm sure there are times when this charge is used and is trumped up, but I do believe that there is a difference between having sex with an underage person and maintaining a sexual relationship with them. I'm not passing judgement on anyone here. Maybe I'm a cynic, maybe I'm a realist, and maybe I have it all wrong, but for me it's pretty black and white when it comes to an adult having sex with an underage person. This is just my view of course.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 345
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 345 |
It is easy to maintain a sexual relationship with a girl that tells you she is 17 but after you're arrested the girl cry's wolf that he raped her only because it takes the pressure of the 17 year old girl that happens to be only 15. The biggest shock I ever got in my life and that was jury duty. Just imagine the above when a so call 17 year old was screwing any guy she could get her hands on but once busted by the strict parents she cried foul to take the pressure of herself from the parents so she sucked up to her parents saying, he RAPED ME!! so the 19 year old guy got charged with multiple counts of rape,maintaining a sexual relationship with a child under 16, attempted Rape, and just about every other charge that the police could throw at him The truth came out that this girl was a low life telling the blokes drinking at the pub she was 18 but to everybody else she was 17 but really she was just under 16 so tell me where is the black and white there. He lost his apprenticeship over this, he was bashed, his parents had to fork out $75,000 in legal fees, the money was never reimbursed by the Government but if that girl won she would have walked away with stash full of cash and remember this dog that lied only because she as scared of a bashing from her own Christian parents if she told them that the truth.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 345
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 345 |
Forgot something Did she ever get punished by the Crown, NO, did they send here the lawyers bill from the young guy she framed, NO, Did the parents of this girl ever try to help the guy she ruined, NO, just sold their house and moved away. No black and white here and they tell me the courts a full of these same types of cases.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
It is easy to maintain a sexual relationship with a girl that tells you she is 17 but after you're arrested the girl cry's wolf that he raped her only because it takes the pressure of the 17 year old girl that happens to be only 15. The biggest shock I ever got in my life and that was jury duty. Just imagine the above when a so call 17 year old was screwing any guy she could get her hands on but once busted by the strict parents she cried foul to take the pressure of herself from the parents so she sucked up to her parents saying, he RAPED ME!! so the 19 year old guy got charged with multiple counts of rape,maintaining a sexual relationship with a child under 16, attempted Rape, and just about every other charge that the police could throw at him The truth came out that this girl was a low life telling the blokes drinking at the pub she was 18 but to everybody else she was 17 but really she was just under 16 so tell me where is the black and white there. He lost his apprenticeship over this, he was bashed, his parents had to fork out $75,000 in legal fees, the money was never reimbursed by the Government but if that girl won she would have walked away with stash full of cash and remember this dog that lied only because she as scared of a bashing from her own Christian parents if she told them that the truth.
Do you know what I have been talking about that once I spew it out will cause problems well you could say the above is say one piece of it and the public will be shocked when I splatter this on a public forum.(no it has nothing to do with cases) As for BLACK and WHITE after I fill this forum with what I am about to say you will think the Gold Coast Cops fudging the arrest are honest. (Another PS) Black and White will never be used again when you will read what the crown and the Police have been up to. Maybe this is the reason why the crown smells a rat and has spotted me in ????????? to many times ( Not Smart enough)wondering what I'm legally doing there and deliberately delaying my case as only an idiot would release what I have before my day in court.Once I release what I have done and any one can do for the moment I want others to do exactly the same until they change the Law. Haaaaa fuckwits.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
But will they and can they change the law easily?
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
I appreciate your point of view jarmet and yes the story that you have told is one that isn't as clear cut as it may seem. But I don't agree with you that it is easy to maintain a sexual relationship with an underage person simply because you didn't know that they were underage. Ignorance is not an excuse, and really, you have to question why a person would be having a "relationship" be it sexual or not if they didn't know something as simple as the persons age or at least enough about them to clarify if the age that thet told you was correct. I can understand that defence of ignorance if they had slept with an underage person once or twice, this making it more of a casual thing. But to maintain a sexual relationship, having sexual intercourse with this person on numerous occasions and not really knowing how old the person was, sorry but I don't buy that.
I agree that the 19 year old in your story got screwed over. He certainly didn't deserve the charges he had against him. I didn't say that the law was always right. My view is that any adult having a sexual relationship with a underage person is wrong. Because at the end of the day, an adult should know better. This is just my view.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
In a nut shell you are right. But what if, the man was entrapped?. What if it only happened the once...? From this once, the man spends 1 yr in prison, loses everything he owns. What if it was beyond the mans control ?.
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 131
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 131 |
Ignorance is not an excuse,
I like the above bit JusticeForAll. I entered my first club the Penrith League club when i was 16, I got drunk from booze I bought when I was 17, I had my first sexual encounter when I was 16 and so did some of my girlfriend and guess what we told all the spunks we were 18 so really half of Penrith's population should have been in jail and you tell me that ignorance is not an excuse, what are you trying to do to us chicks make us have a DOB stamped on our foreheads? Cathy and the girls laughing our heads off.
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 131
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 131 |
In a nut shell you are right. But what if, the man was entrapped?. What if it only happened the once...? From this once, the man spends 1 yr in prison, loses everything he owns. What if it was beyond the mans control ?. sniper All us chick have to do today is open our legs and all the guys brains fizzle up. My girlfriend banged a whole footie team including cops and she was under 18 I didn't see any of them go to jail because she didn't dob anyone in and yes I know my bro told me uuuugh you don't need to be dobbed in from the tools to charge the guys. back later By guys, Cathy and the girls.
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 131
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 131 |
intercourse with this person on numerous occasions and not really knowing how old the person was, sorry but I don't buy that.
Just wondering what closet you have been sleeping in for the last 50 years!! i'm off before I'm in the shit! Cathy and the girls choking with laughter
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Now Cathy please behave yourself, not all today have lived a open life like you have.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109
Astronaut Level 3
|
Astronaut Level 3
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 109 |
Ignorance is not an excuse,
I entered my first club the Penrith League club when i was 16, I got drunk from booze I bought when I was 17, I had my first sexual encounter when I was 16 and so did some of my girlfriend and guess what we told all the spunks we were 18 so really half of Penrith's population should have been in jail and you tell me that ignorance is not an excuse, what are you trying to do to us chicks make us have a DOB stamped on our foreheads? Cathy and the girls laughing our heads off. Well in your case Cathy one would assume that stupidity isn't an excuse either. What are you trying to do to us 'chicks', give us a bad name because you are loose with your morals? I wonder..are the girls that are laughing with you the ones in your head?
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Ignorance is not an excuse,
I like the above bit JusticeForAll. I entered my first club the Penrith League club when i was 16, I got drunk from booze I bought when I was 17, I had my first sexual encounter when I was 16 and so did some of my girlfriend and guess what we told all the spunks we were 18 so really half of Penrith's population should have been in jail and you tell me that ignorance is not an excuse, what are you trying to do to us chicks make us have a DOB stamped on our foreheads? Cathy and the girls laughing our heads off. Unfortunately this happens a lot today girls taking advantage because they look older than what they're. The Lawyers know this, the crown knows this but they don't care as all they care is convicting the guy and thus is the reason why they have this new maintaining a sexual relationship charge because a mile of cases like this were fronting the courts and the crown was losing them all but with this new charge if he or she say they had consensual sex he is gone. What stinks is even if the girl gives evidence during a pre-recording which she does that she conned the guy telling him she was older do you think the prosecution cares? No Fucking way, all the prosecutor want to do is win,win,win and fill the jail with more suckers sunk with this new charge.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577
Payload Specialist Level 2
|
Payload Specialist Level 2
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 577 |
Ignorance is not an excuse,
I entered my first club the Penrith League club when i was 16, I got drunk from booze I bought when I was 17, I had my first sexual encounter when I was 16 and so did some of my girlfriend and guess what we told all the spunks we were 18 so really half of Penrith's population should have been in jail and you tell me that ignorance is not an excuse, what are you trying to do to us chicks make us have a DOB stamped on our foreheads? Cathy and the girls laughing our heads off. Well in your case Cathy one would assume that stupidity isn't an excuse either. What are you trying to do to us 'chicks', give us a bad name because you are loose with your morals? I wonder..are the girls that are laughing with you the ones in your head? Cathy is Cathy but she has a very valid point, why should a guy be sent to prison when clearly the girl lied about her age. Again the new Charge was bought in for that reason
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515 |
Oh boy, teenage sex.
Now that is an interesting topic. A topic that came up just recently between my partner and I actually.
The shoe is on the other foot for me and I'm somewhat in a Catch 22, but I feel my decision is the correct one pertaining to my situation.
My partner and I don't live under the same roof, but he's aware that my 15 year old daughter has been sexually active in the past.
Although my daughter is not currently sexually active, I have not permitted her to use any form of contraception.
My partner thought this was a wrong move on my part. He gave me the lecture about responsible parenting with a potentially sexually active teenager.
I personally don't think I'm a stupid woman and I like to think that I do have a great deal of common sense... And I am pretty sure that other parents will agree with me when I say that what we would normally do is often what we find ourselves deliberately NOT doing when we are involved with DoCS.
I let my partner go on about it and admittedly I was in complete agreement with him.
Then I dropped my bombshell...
He is aware that I am involved with DoCS and I said to him quite frankly that even though my daughter is 15 and DoCS are scared of her - it would not do my son or my other daughters any favours if DoCS were to get wind of the fact that I had put my 15 year old daughter on some form of contraception.
Forget the fact that I would be showing responsibility as a parent.
All DoCS would see was a parent condoning under age sexual activity in a 15 year old child by permitting the child to have a prescription for contraception whether the child was indulging in sexual activity or not.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 386
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 386 |
hows that ....children scared of the dept of safety employees....great one.....and a common happening.....ask any child now an adult, that was under these morons....they hate them with a passion....safety from whom!!!!
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
agree, my step daughter now has a hate for Family SA and the cops. Cos! these educated penis smokers, conducted all their actions right in front of all the children.
No concerns about the said children, as they were man handling me out of the house. I even asked my partner for a hug and kiss, before i was placed in the cops car. Family SA nazis, Stopped her from giving me that hug and kiss.
These scams didnt care about the actions they were doing in front of the children. All they cared about was getting me out of the house and placing me either in the watch house or the streets. Then Im told to ring crisis care for accommodation, What a frking load of poo, it was crisis care,Family Sa, that throw me out on the streets. Thats like going to a person that just placed a bullet in you and your told to go back to the same person for help, Huh?.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515 |
LOL
No, DoCS are the ones who are scared of my daughter.
My daughter is very much like me and she doesn't think twice about ripping off the head of a CSO.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
OP
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 520 |
she only 12. and the fear family sa placed upon her and the family. not only from docs, but also for the cops. what a impression to set a example to a child....her brother and sisters, also have a fear factor. but they are a tad older.
Her mother and I teach her to be respectful to have manners. Since, i have been out of the house, she now has a attitude worse then before. Now her mother is teacher her how to defend against DOCS. Now!!! who is the real terrorist of the world???.
I started to teach her Mauy Thai, so that she could defend herself. hoping she will understand that it could save her life.
|
|
Forums60
Topics706,292
Posts740,906
Members2,957
|
Most Online4,158 Jun 21st, 2024
|
|
|