The ubi frequencies at 12613 H and 12640 H have a signal strength of 81% but their signal quality is only 52%!! They go all crappy every few minutes, especially MAD TV, which is what i usually watch.<br /><br />I'm in Adelaide, have a 90cm dish, and the other transponders on the optus b3 are 82% strength, and 98% signal!<br /><br />Whats wrong! Or are these channels just crappy quality. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="images/icons/default/frown.gif" /> <br /><br />Any suggestions/information?

its not ur signal its them with there uplink signal<br /><br />should be fixed soon <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" />

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by maggas:<br /><strong> The ubi frequencies at 12613 H and 12640 H have a signal strength of 81% but their signal quality is only 52%!! They go all crappy every few minutes, especially MAD TV, which is what i usually watch.<br /><br />I'm in Adelaide, have a 90cm dish, and the other transponders on the optus b3 are 82% strength, and 98% signal!<br /><br />Whats wrong! Or are these channels just crappy quality. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="images/icons/default/frown.gif" /> <br /><br />Any suggestions/information? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Yes LOL I live in Adelaide too and I have signal 89 and quality 99 for MAD tv which is what I watch too most of the time as well as some serb channels..and YES I too get pixalation and freezing on MAD as LAZER said is up to uplinking but future looks promising <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> ....

How did you manage 89% signal! or do you you a larger dish?<br /><br />I do have a bloody telstra mobile antenna 20 metres from here, so it could be retarding my signal <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="images/icons/default/frown.gif" /> <br /><br />No,,,,,,, 99% its UBI's problem, I have the same. That Telstra dish will effect C Band more than ku Band. Most in Sydney with C bands are having trouble because of unwired internet.<br /> <br /> <small>[ 25. January 2005, 08:12 AM: Message edited by: Phil Debono ]</small>

I doubt it should be any problems..your signal 81 has nothing to do with freezing that happens on MAD or at the same time ERT for that matter..If it was up to you other channels would look crappy like pink, or bktv...but it doesnt does it? Its gotta do with the uplink problems for those certain channels such as ERT n MAD at the same time...<br /><br />I am not sure how I got 89! I just aligned it, I meant moved it a bit left and few degrees up from pas8 and I got the signal like it is..I am not sure whats the size of the dish maybe 65cm??? as it is nothing flashy (was ex TARBS customer). <br />I honestly think your 81% signal should still be OK for you to watch channels (from your end)

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by maggas:<br /><strong> How did you manage 89% signal! or do you you a larger dish?<br /><br />I do have a bloody telstra mobile antenna 20 metres from here, so it could be retarding my signal <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="images/icons/default/frown.gif" /> <br /><br />No,,,,,,, 99% its UBI's problem, I have the same. That Telstra dish will effect C Band more than ku Band. Most in Sydney with C bands are having trouble because of unwired internet. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">sorry maggas instead of adding to you post I edited it by mistake. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/default/confused.gif" />

haha Phil, I thought something was wrong about my post <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/default/rolleyes.gif" /> <br /><br />Hope UBI fixes the problem soon. I noticed I used strength/signal instead of signal strength/quality, thats my mistake. I get 81% signal strength and 55% quality for UBI frequencies (82%/98% for the other transponders).<br /><br />What quality % do other people get for UBI transponders? After all that's the important part, at how well the channel is recreated on your TV <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/default/smile.gif" /><br /> <br /> <small>[ 25. January 2005, 01:24 PM: Message edited by: maggas ]</small>

Hi maggas, in Western Sydney where I live, Signal Strength/Quality respectively 80%/60% @65cm Dish...

Adelaide, <br />I get signal 89%<br />lowest quality %94 highest %98 on UBI, on Globecast I get about 89%/84% something like that

Is your LNB in the correct position? because if its in the same position as pas 8 its wrong.

I'm assuming pas8 is the satellite tarbs was on, but I never had tarbs so no <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/default/smile.gif" /> <br /><br />From what I gather, as the vertical polarised transponders give me an almost perfect quality % and the horizontal polarised ones (ie UBI) do not, I need to change the elevation on my satellite. (Yr 12 Physics came in handy! yay <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/default/wink.gif" /> )<br /><br />I think my arguement makes sense <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> , what do you guys think?<br /><br />(Can't go on the roof for the next couple of days I'll get burned in this weather <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="images/icons/default/mad.gif" /> )<br /> <img src="http://home.iprimus.com.au/jimslob/ubi.png" alt=" - " /><br /><br />Here is a sketch of what I think, and the X where i think my LNB is at the moment. More lines = more signal, you get the general idea.<br /> <br /> <small>[ 25. January 2005, 06:06 PM: Message edited by: maggas ]</small>

Maggas You sound like a creepy, stingy guy... why don’t you pay someone to fix everything for you... rather than annoying everyone here...<br /><br />Ill give you money to do it...<br /><br />Slobs like you... are wasting our resources<br /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/default/rolleyes.gif" />

well i cant understand...<br />GET SOMEONE TO DO IT <br /><br />YOU CANT GET EVERYTHING FOR FREE

Ok... ok .... I’m sorry Maggas... its just that today i lost my job and my wife cheated on me with my best friend.... My apologies for any inconvenience....<br /><br />I hope we can still be friends...<br /><br />Right now you are my only friend... you and that guy Adrian on 5aa...<br /><br />Sorry friend... Please reply and forgive me<br /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/default/rolleyes.gif" />

Sound like me back in 1975.

maggas I am not sure if you still can watch or not UBI?

Sorry about the confusion, I was tired when I wrote it and well I didnt know what I was saying. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <br /><br />Basically from what I gather, as the vertival polarised channels are perfect and the horizontal polarised ones are not, the azmirth of my dish is fine but the elevation of my dish must be slightly off. - Does this make logical sense? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/default/confused.gif" /> <br /><br />BTW whos this dhead asfasfasfas <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="images/icons/default/shocked.gif" />

yeah elevation should be I think a bit higher than 45 lover than 50 degrees..UBI sends a stronger signal and from what I heard then you ll get a better quality (those channels on horizontal pol), those on vertical have a bit weaker signal and hence less of a quality level you ll get on your box.<br />cheers

Finally cooled down enuf for me to go on the roof, and after 14 failed attempts (and noone inside to help me), I finally got a better quality for the horizontal polarised (ubi) transponders.<br /><br />I got signal at 83% and quality at 66% (which is better than the original 52% quality i had), and the ver pol tps are still 82%/98%. Hence my theory was supported <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <br /><br />I do not think the UBI channels r better quality than the others, as night_flight suggests. I'm just happy my theory actually turned out to be valid <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/default/smile.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/default/wink.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/default/tongue.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/default/rolleyes.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <br /><br />Thanks for the help/suggestion everyone.<br /> <br /> <small>[ 26. January 2005, 07:15 PM: Message edited by: maggas ]</small>

dnt know bout adelaide but for me in sydney with my 90cm dish the UBI transponders seem to be strounger and hold out alot longer in the rain <br /><br />then the weaker globecast transponders when raining they cut out <br /><br />the signal i get for these channels on B3 are<br /><br />Globecast <br />12525 and 12658 V 30000 <br />Signal 85% Quality 65%<br /><br />UBI<br />12614,12640,12674 and 12701 H 22500<br />Signal 85% Quality 80%<br /><br />BTW im using a moteck so signal may seem abit lower then normal cause its skewed for other sats aswell <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /><br /> <br /> <small>[ 26. January 2005, 07:17 PM: Message edited by: -.Lazer.- ]</small>

Maybe you need to slightly alter your satellite's azmirth, as opposed to the elevation that i needed to alter.

yes but i have a moteck which i have adjusted the lnb and dish to work on about 5 different sats<br /><br />BTW a moteck is a eletronic positioner powered and controlled by the reciever which it can move the dish to see different sats <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /><br /> <br /> <small>[ 26. January 2005, 07:22 PM: Message edited by: -.Lazer.- ]</small>

Oh sorry didn't see your edited post...<br /><br />Also Sydney's geographic position, compared to Adelaide's, would give you better horizontal tps if you think about it, as the horizontal pol waves would be more curved here than in Sydney, if you know what I mean. And your weaker ver pol tps are prolly cos of you have a moteck.<br /><br />This may all be wrong, but hey I tried!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" />

yeh maybe it all works good enough anyway to watch the channels so its all good <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/default/wink.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" />

That's the important part <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/default/smile.gif" />

yep thats it <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/default/wink.gif" /> <br /><br />here is the footprint of the optus B3 satellite which shows the different power level and parts of australia and new zealand it covers<br /><br />i think UBI are using the high perfomance beam while globecast use the dual AUS/NZ beam anyway if ur interested here is the link<br /><br />http://www.optusbusiness.com.au/00/13/0013b.asp

hehe I was just there yesterday <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/default/wink.gif" /> <br /><br />Thanks anyway.<br /><br />Yeah I noticed UBI's high performance beam too, but I dunno what that means <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <br /><br />Gimme 2 yrs to finish off my uni degree and I'm sure I'll have an explanation by then <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/default/smile.gif" />

hehehe no worries <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/default/wink.gif" /><br /> <br /> <small>[ 26. January 2005, 07:51 PM: Message edited by: -.Lazer.- ]</small>

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by maggas:<br /><strong><br />I do not think the UBI channels r better quality than the others, as night_flight suggests. I'm just happy my theory actually turned out to be valid <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/default/smile.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/default/wink.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/default/tongue.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/default/rolleyes.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/default/grin.gif" /> <br /><br />Thanks for the help/suggestion everyone. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">I am not sure man could be but I know my signal is a lot better for UBI than for Globecast channels as Lazer was saying too...I dunno...and I live in Adelaide too (Port Adelaide area)

I get 98% quality for Globecast compared to 66% quality for UBI (both about 82% signal) [sorry for being repetative] so I disagree.<br /><br />Maybe if I rotate my LNB 90degrees these values will switch <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="images/icons/default/smile.gif" /> I can't be stuffed, so the world will never know <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/default/rolleyes.gif" />

yes u could be very right...I was just thinking that LNB could be the reason too...my lnb sits something like cable facing the ground almost