|
|
|
0 members (),
5,512
guests, and
22
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
Small magnitude 3.6 earthquake strikes near Great Falls, Cascade County, Montana, USA
• Volcano earthquake report for Friday, 18 September 2026
• Possible earthquake reported minutes ago near Great Falls, Montana, USA
• Magnitude 4.6 earthquake strikes near Ponce, Segundo Barrio, Ponce Municipi...
• Small magnitude 3.4 earthquake strikes near Skegness, Lincolnshire, England...
• World Earthquake Report for Friday, 18 September 2026
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7
Space Trainee
|
|
Space Trainee
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7 |
iF im right or wrong this threat was past history  2004. I believe at least 2.3mesh dish is far better then other levels.<br /><br />I have 2 satellite dishes.. One is a 2.4mesh dish but strong frame and was bought in 2000. While the new dish i recently got is very very light and could easily break if not too carefully but allways coution when hail apears in summer times and it is a 2.3mesh dish. Was told these days know in 2006 the 2.3mesh dish is very good and people buy them, But your could correct me if that isn't true.<br /><br />I believe larger dish will just make no differents either it is a 2.3mesh dish but perhaps its just signal strenth differents but you get the same packages on each satellites available with a good receiver.<br /><br /><br /><br />regards<br />Pascual
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics830,708
Posts865,503
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|