A Comparison of Radio Frequency Interference Within and Outside of Allocated Passive Earth Exploration Bands at 10.65 Ghz and 18.7 Ghz Using the GPM Microwave Imager and Windsat

0 members (), 218 guests, and 29 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.

KSC PAD 39A

KSC PAD 39B

TLE DATA

IDB.COM.AU
For all your TLE downloads.

Today's Birthdays

There are no members with birthdays on this day.

AUS-CITY Latest Photos

Art By MA
by Alisa, July 27

"5greenheart" by MA
by Alisa, July 27

"3moons" by MA
by Alisa, July 27

Art By MA
by Alisa, July 27

Popular Topics(Views)

AUS-CITY Earthquake Map

AUS-CITY Advertisements

Print Thread

Rate Thread

A Comparison of Radio Frequency Interference Within and Outside of Allocated Passive Earth Exploration Bands at 10.65 Ghz and 18.7 Ghz Using the GPM Microwave Imager and Windsat #471416 Sun 09 Sep 2018 01:34:PM
Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 381,903 Los Angeles, USA Webmaster OP Launch Director
OP Webmaster Launch Director Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 381,903 Los Angeles, USA	Abstract: Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) for Microwave Imagers has been increasing over time for L-band, C-Band, X-Band, Ku-Band The GPM constellation of radiometers provides a unique dataset that we can use to survey the RFI environment RFI at 10 GHz has been increasing over the last 2 decades. -Wider bandwidths (like WindSat), outside of the 10.6 to 10.7 GHz allocated band, don't provide substantial RFI rejection over land -The major advantage of remaining within the allocated band at 10.6 to 10.... Source: A Comparison of Radio Frequency Int...ing the GPM Microwave Imager and Windsat David Cottle UBB Owner & Administrator