apparently in my case the docs worker on the phone said i did the right thing by moving house etc to loose the father of the child when I was pregnant as I was scared for myself and my unborn child. docs CSO X didn't like that when I said that you her.
She was trying to tell me that they had evidence/ documentation that I had prevented the father from having contact with the child by moving. I said but I moved whilst I was 7 months pregnant. I sought help from a solicitor and a counsellor during this time. I was scared of this man. CSO X didn't like it when I told her I did this whilst pregnant. The pregnancy hadn't even resulted in a live birth so how could I be stopping the father from access visits?
The docs worker I just rang said I was acting as the protective parent to do this whilst pregnant.

I gave her the run down on the phone. She asked if i had my files yet throught FOI. I hope she taped my call. She told me that if a child is removed interstate then docs have to go through the court to obtain a 'directive order' that directs the mother to stay away or have supervised contact. None of this occurred. This CSO I just spoke to said this should have happened if this was the case and that an interstate liason officer should have been involved.
Hmmm more unethical/ unprofessional practices from docs.
I talked to her about civil action - which I will look into one day soon.

I am going to a domestic violence meeting soon to target domestic and family violence.

I will make this another issue of interest and report back to you all what I find out.
Information enables us to know what should occur, and how docs should be acting.