Originally Posted by Alisa
Do you think that the planet would be better off for you and/or all humans, if it was in constant balance without the negative polarity? Would it be better off for anyone ever in any way?
The level of thinking for this question is too simplified to give a reasonable answer. I do not mean to dissuade you. "Better off" for one may not be "better" for another. Does constant imply permanence? Are you expecting only either yes or no in answering? I only mean to point out difficulties I see in responding.



Quote
How do you know that critical mass was reached years ago? I do not mock you at all, I merely want to know how you know these things.
Same way you may know anything. Perhaps I will elucidate on that a little and say that it is closer to understanding, by the concepts I use, for I always concede to further knowledge being gained on the topic.


Quote
If anger is, then aren't all emotions artifacts of the soul peering through the "conscious lens" to this consciousness? But isn't anger a result of fear?
No, I do not understand that to be the case. In addition, there is more to be considered in this. Think "multiple-level".
I would say anger can be the result of fear, but is not always.