An example of a negative "attack" might be the interaction with an individual which (attempts to) produce feelings of depression or discontent.
Ah, I see. Kind of like a magnetic reaction that raises up in opposition?
Opposition would be "fighting back". This would be an attempt to deny the other in an STS manner.
There is a magnetic component to the interaction. Consider why one might make such an attack in the first place if you will.
I don't think there can be an objective definition of good and evil. I have felt and still do that there are only varying degrees of good. Which is subjective, but what else is there besides subjectivity with concepts that are not physical?
Even with the conventional concepts of objectivity and subjectivity there is objectivity in thought as there is in physicality. Mainstream philosophy and psychology is devoid of this; it would be empowering for one thing and empowered slaves generally no longer want to be slaves.
I had taken a course in Philosophy right out of high school and was amazed at the first lecture to learn that there was an area of study where people debated about whether God exists and other amazing stuff (stuff I always thought about for which my family implied made me crazy
).
Yes questioning reality or - if you are daring - society itself, clearly makes one "crazy". Curiosity makes one crazy too. More programming.
When I started to actually try to properly philosophize though...it was hard and I was confused. It took me a long time to get my paper done. But it stuck with me so strongly, the brilliant concept of subjectivity as the reason that good cannot be defined. Though at the time and far into the future, I still did not know of the actual term
subjectivity. And I ended up dropping out of school and doing stupid human stuff for about 10 years. I wasted my time, but I had no one around me that thought the same or could guide me or even provide a reasonable example of enlightenment (with the exception of some academic teachers, but they could not give me their time outside of class). So I just floated in a sea of stupid human stuff thinking, Oh man, is this all there is?
Yes pointless loops, which seem to be quite the many with such areas in academia. Out of curiosity, what was their example or definition of enlightenment?
You have not stopped asking, which in itself may say something would you agree?
To my understanding the question is redundant for one of the paths to begin with. Also it may be self evident to a degree with communications so far and you are also learning to see with your own eyes - so redundant in three ways.
I'm not sure what you mean in the first sentence. Or do you mean it is redundant for the STO path because it is comprised of nearly 50/50? If so, even so, it is still a very specific path compared to the alternative. I
think you are STS. But I
fear you are STO. [Typing that and releasing the pressure of the underlying fear just elicted a wave of emotion from me
].
The concept of work was a keystone in the question. If it is work in the common sense - ie effort in
order to achieve a goal or "success", then STO do not do this to my understanding. If it is work as defined in physics for example then this is probably ok. The STO polarity is a ratio with an higher output than input.
Let us say that there is a degree of destiny so to speak. You may consider this with those that upon hearing of ascension or similar, assume that they (their waking conscious mind)is in full control of their "future" and act accordingly. I do not assume anything (as consciously as I can of course), nor do I concern myself with trying to be this or that. I have some degree of conscious awareness of my future however, but again, I leave open the possibility that I am in error or have missed something. So I do the work and accept the result, whatever it may be.
For state, as in saying if one is STS or STO, it is necessary to consider things from a multi-level perspective - the Ra material mentions this for memory.
I'm interested in the emotional response. If you are willing to share - why do you think you felt what you felt for example?
Also why do you think I am or might be STSor feel I might be STO? You may note that it makes no difference to me if I am perceived as STS, evil, hated or anything of the sort - not that I am saying any of this applies to you.
I don't know how you can do all those quotes when I can only do 4?!
I simply click the quote button when I go to reply to a post and then edit any of the quote tags as necessary.
Re: Soul anger, you said "Imbalanced STS expression". I don't know what you mean. To me those three words could be interpreted in numerous ways. Will you explain it to me please?
An STS oriented entity or aspect of the self expresses anger as a response to a result not matching an expected or desired outcome. Fear may of course be a factor - fear that the entity may "fail" again and the results there of.
