|
|
|
0 members (),
1,120
guests, and
25
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
World Earthquake Report for Monday, 25 May 2026
• Moderate mag. 4.1 earthquake - 80 km northwest of Galela, Kabupaten Halmahe...
• Moderate magnitude 4.5 quake hits 102 km northeast of Manokwari, Indonesia ...
• Volcano earthquake report for Monday, 25 May 2026
• Moderate mag. 4.8 earthquake - South Pacific Ocean, 89 km northeast of Mano...
• Moderate mag. 4.0 earthquake - South Pacific Ocean, 81 km southwest of Moll...
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 55
Astronaut Level 2
|
Astronaut Level 2
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 55 |
To add to this thought, one day when I was reflecting on some reading I had just done about people who get abducted by aliens that then seemingly hurt them, I thought, Oo, I wonder if my guides would protect me if these aliens abducted me! At which point a spirit message clearly interupted my thought process saying, emphatically, You would protect yourself. All things [of this realm] are consensual.
In essence all is consensual as an individual will choose based on knowledge/awareness or lack there-of. I suppose that it would be up to the violator to admit to doing it consciously, and hopefully wish to pay restitution. But if not, then it would be up to a judge/jury to decide. It would be great if there were people who could simply divine the truth. Or even better if all the citizens would be taught and accept the concept of responsibility as part of their upbringing and societal structure.
Would you really need a judge/jury? Then what - police and jails? Teaching could be ok, but if it were a case of the way in which the people must or are expected to act, are we not back to either/or indoctrination and conformity? Do you not recall (assuming it is true for the moment) universal balance? An analogy of how I see people responsibly coexisting is like cells in a body. Each cell has its function and its boundaries. Not enough resources starve the cell, and too many drown it. Also, one cell should not impede upon another cell. It should work within its boundaries and limitation and should expect that its boundaries are also respected.What determines this "should" or how might it come about?I meant that an ideal society behaves like physical cells behave when they are efficient and balanced. That's the analogy I was making. They stay within their own boundaries, do their intended job, and they seem to be regulated with the right amount of nutrients and a good flow, etc. Yes I am merely looking at the "should" part - what might determine why or how an individual works or behaves in this manner...
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics776,784
Posts811,582
Members2,960
| |
Most Online22,463 May 9th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 1996 - 2026 by David Cottle. Designed by David Bate Jr. All Rights Reserved.
By using this forum, the user agrees not to transfer any data or technical information received under this agreement to any other entity without the express approval of the AUS-CITY Forum Admins and/or authors of individual posts (Forum Admins and DoD/USSPACECOM for the analysis of satellite tracking data).
Two-line elements (TLE) and all other satellite data presented and distributed via this forum and AUS-CITY mailing lists are distributed with permission from DoD/USSTRATCOM.
|
|