|
|
|
1 members (Alisa),
1,704
guests, and
19
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
M 4.3 - 24 km SE of Kasilof, Alaska
• M 3.2 - 77 km N of Charlotte Amalie, U.S. Virgin Islands
• M 1.7 - 9 km SSW of Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico
• M 2.0 - 15 km NNE of Milford, Utah
• M 2.0 - 8 km S of Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico
• M 6.0 - 58 km SSE of Shima, Japan
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352 |
I think Sharon is either employed by The Department or was employed by The Department.
I have recently encountered some ex CSO/docs workers who must have been the honest/ sincere type. I listened to them and thought wow. then I have meet the ex CSO who think docs are very corrupt (more than one).
I think it must depend on what branch you encounter.
Yes, there is good and bad in all types of employees who are in the service providers.
It goes back to transference and counter transference issues as I mentioned before. And that basic question of who's needs are we meeting?
I found some old stuff on selection and recruitment. I have been intending to write out my arguement around this factual stuff and put it into context of the government employing very raw inexperienced CSO's and putting them on the coal face. Who is responsible - the CSO or the government body for allowing such inexperienced staff to have to make decisions that they have little experience with. I'll type it out in full one other day.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics905,190
Posts939,987
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|