I do not 'make' you, you choose to. But I gather this is another 'misnomer' in language which you may be becoming aware of at this point. Progress requires 'work' to be done. It need not be viewed as work per se, it may also be 'effortless'. However, the "truth can hurt" and "no pain no gain" may be evident at various times in the seeking. Also to note is the more helpful a communication and the more one progresses, the increased likelihood an individual may become a target for negative "attack".
Yes, I am becoming more aware of my choice of vocabulary here. I think it is very helpful to have carefully examined various definitions thanks to your prompting, or should I say thanks to your "making" me.
What do you mean by a target for a negative "attack"?
What is a negative attack, for example?
Unless you have an objective definition of "good", then we are floating in subjectivity. Some might think it is good, others might not. It is as it is. You may also note that it is the structure itself that is in balance in such a situation. Levels of the hierarchy will be imbalanced with respect to each other. Pain is a catalyst for growth.
The first philosophy paper (of only a few I ever wrote) was entitled, "Good Cannot Be Defined".
I guess that, and what you said, covers it. It matters less to me now anyway since I just began reading the Ra material regarding "harvest" (thanks to you!
). It cleared things up for me in a big way. Messages I have received, things I've learned, the way I
am, what I am drawn to, all fell into a clearer organization now that I understand more about the service to self/negative path entities! Finally!
I have only begun to read, so I won't ask any questions yet except, are you working toward the path of service-to-self or to service-to-others?
I do not teach academically, nor would I as "teaching" is understood by society.
Let's say hobby to satisfy the question. But really, is there any point when we are not learning?
Well, you sure are good! Oops, I better try to define
good in this instance: knowledgeable, instructive, thought-provoking, and interesting. And I totally agree with you about learning, though I have always phrased it as
my religion is progression.
How did we get to angry souls?!
(I'm using the quote graemlins because when I went to post I received a message that I exceeded my quota for quotes in a post - it seems I can only do 4 - how is it you can do 6?!)
I was trying to understand how the soul can feel anger (or how anger originates at the soul level, if it does) as opposed to it just being a bodily chemical. Because of our discussion...
Which emotions are "artifacts of the soul peering through the "conscious lens" to this consciousness level?"
Al - Common anger would be one example of emotional expression seen on this consciousness level.
