I'm going to put your quotes in Blue and mine in Red (since you are water and I am fire - and since I can't seem to use more than 4 quotes for some reason! annoyed).

Better from your perspective?

Yes, from mine.

Also could you define responsibility - what it may imply in such a society, I do not need a dictionary definition.

This is in part what made me wonder if you were an academic teacher. chuckle Sounds like something a teacher would say.

Responsibility means that a person does not deny the affect their actions create. It doesn't mean they have to rectify or restitute (unless the action was intentionally to create harm, and then they must experience some form of restitution to whatever was harmed). However, if someone perceives that they have been harmed by the action of another, but the other did not intend to harm, then it is considered a natural consequence of co-existence and does not require restitution. (Besides, we draw to ourselves that which we need to experience, including hardship, and it is divine will acting through human agents or other means that brings this perceived "harm" about and therefore it is not the human agent's will, nor their responsibility to fix).

Also, responsibility means that if you want something that isn't on offer, you find a way to get it yourself. Whether this means you seek someone out who can help you and you ask them if they would be willing, or if you figure out how to do it yourself. Nothing is free and in excess. You take what you need, and give freely of your excesses.

An analogy of how I see people responsibly coexisting is like cells in a body. Each cell has its function and its boundaries. Not enough resources starve the cell, and too many drown it. Also, one cell should not impede upon another cell. It should work within its boundaries and limitation and should expect that its boundaries are also respected.

If possible could you please elaborate on the last statement in the quote.

Second Scenario:
Here there is no sickness because there is no imbalance. I also think that there would be no ageing and no birth.
I believe this would emanation - but the return path to creator.

Ugh, I didn't do a good job on this. Hmmm thinking I have received several messages that there will be no sickness in the "reformation", for lack of a better word, whatever that is and whenever it will be. I think illness is due to imbalance. I often get sick when I am having a huge spiritual challenge. I have found that it is because I am fighting the new information. The more I have learned to accept things and flow, the less I have become ill. Fighting is blocking and it stops flow. Balance requires flow (info moving in and out in a balanced ratio).

Aging and birth - I think that this is part of the density we have descended to as parts of the creator. We hit bottom at some point and are headed back up. It has been necessary for new scenarios and forgetfulness, etc. during this descent. But after a certain point of maturity is reached, it is no longer necessary. So you don't have to go through that cycle. I think this is part of the reformation.

Emanation is a word I received a few years ago and then researched. I understand it to mean that God/Creator descends (breaks down into pieces) and then ascends and reforms after hitting bottom (or the outer limits). It is a way for the creator to grow - sending out its particles to gain their own consciousness with these particles then coming back to the creator as "more" (with gifts!).