|
|
|
0 members (),
2,786
guests, and
27
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
World Earthquake Report for Thursday, 24 September 2026
• Moderate mag. 4.3 earthquake - Madagascar: Mozambique Channel on Thursday, ...
• Small magnitude 3.9 earthquake hits near Hastings, Hastings District, Hawke...
• Volcano earthquake report for Thursday, 24 September 2026
• Light mag. 3.9 earthquake - South Pacific Ocean, 10.2 km south of Hastings,...
• Moderate magnitude 4.1 quake hits 31 miles southeast of Midland, Texas, Uni...
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352
Mission Specialist Level 2
|
|
Mission Specialist Level 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 352 |
Oh so true, removed from you because they are deemed 'at risk' and put with other people who could abuse them. Look at my child removed off me due to being a child at risk then actually being abused physically with smacks that lasted one week on his buttocks for pooing his pants.
And 1 in 4 women are sexually abused. Why don't they take every chld off every parent at birth and then the parent has to prove they are worthy to parent. the child could be at risk until proven otherwise. I've argued this before. It sounds mad but do you see my point.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics840,452
Posts875,247
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|