Originally Posted by Alisa
I'm coming to better understand you (or rather, not misunderstanding you as much), so I am not dissuaded. You seem to be making me think harder, clearer, which is something I appreciate. I am fortunate to be having this discussion.
I do not 'make' you, you choose to. But I gather this is another 'misnomer' in language which you may be becoming aware of at this point. Progress requires 'work' to be done. It need not be viewed as work per se, it may also be 'effortless'. However, the "truth can hurt" and "no pain no gain" may be evident at various times in the seeking. Also to note is the more helpful a communication and the more one progresses, the increased likelihood an individual may become a target for negative "attack".


Originally Posted by Alisa
At the time I said that, I was still thinking along the lines that I was advocating darkness/negativity. And I like what I am advocating, so I thought I liked the effect of the negative polarity. I thought it must be necessary to have this negative polarity because I could attest to my spiritual experiences as the greatest form of happiness I have yet known. But now I am not seeing myself as only dark any more at all.
This perhaps could be discussed further at some point.


Originally Posted by Alisa
So now I have to ask, do you think this plan to achieve balance through the negative polarity was a good idea? Does it matter if it is a positive or a negative if in the end it is balance/zero-point that is sought. Or is negative less favourable for humans because it is painful?
Unless you have an objective definition of "good", then we are floating in subjectivity. Some might think it is good, others might not. It is as it is. You may also note that it is the structure itself that is in balance in such a situation. Levels of the hierarchy will be imbalanced with respect to each other. Pain is a catalyst for growth.


Originally Posted by Alisa
Oh, and have you seen this Window of Opportunity by Hidden Hand. He claims he is a member of the "ruling family", and he answers questions forum members had about the reaping (2012) through the negative polarity.
If it is the same as I have read previously then yes. I would suggest if you have not done so already reading the Ra material and cross referencing as seen applicable.


Originally Posted by Alisa
I really meant what is your background? Are you a teacher of philosophy, or have you held some such position that accounts for your depth of understanding? Or do you just study as a hobby?
I do not teach academically, nor would I as "teaching" is understood by society.
Let's say hobby to satisfy the question. But really, is there any point when we are not learning?


Originally Posted by Alisa
Why is the soul angry from peering through the conscious lens? Is it because it is trapped in a body?

How did we get to angry souls?! There may indeed be the emotional anger expressed on this level as a resultant of the necessity of the soul incarnating into a (particular) body.