|
|
|
0 members (),
1,774
guests, and
26
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
Volcano earthquake report for Thursday, 15 October 2026
• M 2.0 - 53 km NNE of Chignik, Alaska
• M 4.3 - 92 km ESE of Tomioka, Japan
• M 2.2 - 5 km SE of Coalinga, CA
• M 1.5 - 6 km SSW of Fortuna, CA
• M 3.3 - 125 km SE of Akutan, Alaska
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
Payload Specialist Level 1
|
|
Payload Specialist Level 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 515 |
Yep that is usually the way.
But the best thing to do if DoCS want a parent to be assessed by somebody is to refuse to be assessed by anyone that DoCS recommends.
Especially if DoCS are trying to seek some kind of order.
They "report shop". DoCS will send a person to a professional whom they know will write a report that they can use to their favour in the court room.
They don't like it if a parent stands up and declares that they want another person to assess them and write the report... But they can't deny it.
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
|
Forums60
Topics877,209
Posts912,005
Members2,960
| |
Most Online102,106 Jul 10th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|