Originally Posted by rainbowchaser
Yes, unlawful carnal knowledge is a child sex offense.


And like all the the others charges they are old and tired and USELESS.

But now we have latest with duel exhaust and a super charger and its called maintaining a sexual relationship with a child under 16.
Like I said before since this charge has been introduced with its buddy called a 93a its just about impossible to escape it and 70% of the times even with no real evidence the person will be found guilty.
See the 93a is GOD, and its to be treated this way and boy O boy don't the prosecutors know it as they push this to the hilt to the jury to convict a person on what a Child wrote if the child wrote it as they also allow the parents of the child to write it (They can add juicy bits in) + what the child says in front of a video recording.
(PS DO you know the crown edit the bits out of the tape that doesn't suit them and its up to the defence team before the trial to argue to have them put back in)

The Public today have not got a clue what goes on in a court room today

Last edited by I Hate GOV, DEPT; Thu 06 Nov 2008 09:46:PM.